Upfront Article Essay : Designer Babies By Isobel Weiner 813

The article, “Designer Babies” by Patricia Smith, featured in the May 12^th volume of  ‘Upfront’ magazine, discusses how through advancements in scientific understanding, parents may soon be allowed to create a ‘perfect’ baby.

There are many differing opinions concerning this possibility. Some people are voicing ethical questions about whether we should interfere with the way humans reproduce, while others think that being able to select traits such as “tall” and “athletic” is a beneficial development. Scientists agree with the progress being made towards genetic advancements, as diseases such as sickle cell anemia, hemophilia, and cystic fibrosis could be replaced with healthy genes. Dr. Alan Copperman, director of reproductive endocrinology and infertility at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City states, “the most exciting part, scientifically, is to be able to prevent or fix an error in the genetic machinery.” Morally, I believe that a procedure to alter genes is wrong, and that people shouldn’t be allowed to assemble the ‘perfect child’.

The reasoning behind my belief is that by changing the DNA of your child, you are completely altering who they would have become if they had been reproduced the human way. If everyone began creating “designer babies” there would be no individuality or diversity. Parents would choose the best traits for their child, therefore making them just another ‘perfect’ human. The uniqueness of each individual human would be lost. Additionally, there are health risks involved. If scientists wrongly alter an individual’s genes, the defect becomes inheritable. Other people agree with my opinion. Among them is Jeremy Gruber, president of the Council for Responsible Genetics, who fears these procedures could cause genetic abnormalities or remove positive traits accidentally.

Some people think that by creating designer babies and eliminating genetic diseases, scientists are benefitting the human population. Among these people are researchers at BGI in China, who are attempting to test human embryos for IQ so parents can chose the ones with the highest IQ. However, these people are still allowing specific traits to be chosen, and therefore allowing the individuality of each person to be removed. These procedures go against my morals and also go against nature. The way humans reproduce shouldn’t be tampered with in any way; especially considering it could end up badly, as it has in the past. If ethical boundaries for gene research are not put in place, history could repeat itself. The eugenics movement in the early 1900s, in which people discouraged the reproduction of those who have supposed undesirable traits (low IQ, disease), is an example of how genetic science can go too far. Nazis also believed in eugenics, which led to the killing of 6 million Jews, and thousands of gypsies, gays, and the disabled.

In conclusion, I believe that human traits should not selected through scientific procedures, but rather be selected through natural reproduction, as it goes against my morals, and as well as being dangerous, it takes away individuality.

Romeo And Juliet Essay : Who’s to Blame for the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet?

By Isobel Weiner 813

            In the well renowned play ‘Romeo and Juliet’ by William Shakespeare, the main characters, Romeo Montague and Juliet Capulet, are to blame for their deaths. There are other characters in the play, such as Friar Lawrence or Lord Capulet, who could be blamed for their deaths, but ultimately, Romeo and Juliet chose to commit suicide rather than be without one another, so they are responsible for their own deaths.

            For example, in Act 4 Scene 3, Juliet has a monologue about the sleeping potion Friar Lawrence gave her, which would make her appear dead so as to release her from marrying her suitor, Paris. In lines 20-24 Juliet states, “My dismal scene I needs must act alone. Come, vial. What if this mixture do not work at all? Shall I be married then tomorrow morning? (She takes out her knife and puts it down beside her) No, no, this shall forbid it. Lie thou there.” This quote shows how Juliet would rather fake her own death, and if that were to fail, kill herself, then be without Romeo, proving she had intentions of committing suicide. Additionally, in Act 3 Scene 5, Juliet implores her mother to cancel her marriage to Paris by exclaiming, “O sweet my mother, cast me not away. Delay this marriage for a month, a week, or if you do not, make the bridal bed in that dim monument where Tybalt lies.” Once again, this is a quote from Juliet stating how she would rather be dead ‘in that dim monument’ with Tybalt than have to marry Paris and be without Romeo. Also, Juliet has two speeches in Act 4 Scene 1 in which she tells the friar of her willingness to die for her love. The first is “Give me some present counsel, or, behold, ‘twist my extremes and me this bloody knife shall play the umpire, arbitrating that which the commission of thy years and art could to no issue of true honor bring. Be not so long to speak. I long to die if what thou speak’st speak not of remedy.” The second is “O, bid me leap, rather than marry Paris, from off the battlements of yonder tower, or walk in thievish ways, or bid me lurk where serpents are, chain me with roaring bears, or shut me nightly in a charnel house, o'ercovered quite with dead men’s rattling bones, with reeky shanks and yellow chapless skulls, or bid me go into a new-made grave and hide me with a dead man in his shroud (things that, to hear them told have made me tremble), and I will do it without fear or doubt, to live an unstained wife to my sweet love. Finally, in Act 5 Scene 3, Juliet kills herself once she discovers that Romeo is dead, proving how she is responsible for her own death, “Yea, noise? Then I’ll be brief. O, happy dagger, this is thy sheath. There rust, and let me die.” All of these quotes support part of the claim that Juliet is responsible for her own death.

            While Juliet is responsible for her death, Romeo is also responsible for his. In Act 2 Scene 2, Juliet informs Romeo that the Capulets will murder him if they find him by Juliet’s balcony. Romeo responds by saying, “I have night’s cloak to hide me from their eyes, and, but thou love me, let them find me here. My life were better ended by their hate than death prorogued, wanting of thy love.” These lines show how even though Romeo and Juliet just met, Romeo would rather die than be without her. In Act 3 Scene 3, Romeo converses with the Friar about how he would rather die than be banished from Verona, therefore banished from seeing Juliet. “Hadst thou no poison mixed, no sharp-ground knife, no sudden mean of death, though ne’er so mean, but “banished” to kill me? “Banished”? O Friar, the damned use that word in hell.” Another example of how Romeo’s death is his own fault can be found in Act 3 Scene 5, when Romeo says, “let me be ta’en; let me be put to death.” He then continues by saying, “I have more care to stay than will to go. Come death and welcome. Juliet wills it so.” Additionally, in Act 5 Scene 1, Romeo states “well, Juliet, I will lie with thee tonight”, after finding out about Juliet’s death. Romeo then goes on to purchase poison from a poor apothecary, so he may commit suicide and be with Juliet, who he believes to be dead. Finally, in Act 5 Scene 3, Romeo speaks while opening the tomb, “thou detestable maw, thou womb of death, gorged with the dearest morsel of the earth, thus I enforce thy rotten jaws to open, and in despite I’ll cram thee with more food.” The line ‘cram thee with more food’ is another way of saying that Romeo is going to kill himself and lay in the tomb with Juliet. After a long monologue, Romeo drinks the poison, while saying, “O true apothecary, thy drugs are quick. Thus with a kiss I die.” All of these lines of Romeo’s dialogue support the claim that Romeo and Juliet are to blame for their deaths.

            Some people might argue that another character, such as Friar Lawrence, or Lord Capulet, is responsible for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. However, although Friar Lawrence’s plan to feign Juliet’s death and write to Romeo and inform him of the plan failed, he was not ultimately responsible. It would be just as easy to blame Friar John, who was the one who failed to deliver Romeo the letter in Mantua, as stated in Act 5 Scene 2, “I could not send it (here it is again) nor get a messenger to bring it to thee, so fearful were they of infection.” Lord Capulet would also be an easy character to blame. Some might argue that Juliet killed herself because of Capulet’s instance of her marriage to Paris. However, in the end, Juliet stabbed herself and Romeo poisoned himself, meaning that they both committed suicide in the name of love, and their deaths were caused by them.

            In conclusion, there are many characters to blame for the tragic death of Romeo and Juliet, but the two lovers consistently stated throughout the play that they would rather die than be without each other and in the end, that is exactly what happened.

           

            

Writing Prompt By Isobel Weiner 813

In the article, "Should a Hated Word Be Banned?" Rabbi Dov Lipman says that "every country has to establish certain value-based limits" to free speech. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use evidence from the text to support  your response.

In the article, "Should a hated Word be banned?" Rabbi Dov Lipman states, "every Country has to establish certain value-based limits" to free speech. I agree with his statement because the word 'Nazi' and other Holocaust related slurs have such notorious reputations. Adolf Hitler's horrible acts are entwined with these words, and therefore it is for the benefit of the majority that these words be banned.

Even today, the word 'Nazi' brings up traumatic memories for the survivors of the Holocaust, which sadly, is fewer than 200,000 people. Among these terrible memories is the fact that "By the end of World War II in 1945, 6 million Jews had been killed, along with many Gypsies, homosexuals, and others the Nazis considered undesirable."

Trivial use of the word 'Nazi' is another reason to ban the offensive word. According to the article, the term is mentioned casually, in conversations ranging from Israeli politics to normal teenage talks. "We, in our land, can find enough words and expressions and idioms to express our opinions," says Shimon Ohayon, one of the lawmakers sponsoring the bill." Also, teenage Israelis use the word 'shoah' - which means "catastrophe" and is normally involved with the Holocaust - to describe an ending relationship or a messy kitchen. The casual use of the word is offensive and wrong, and therefore the word should be banned. Finally, Rabbi Dov Lipman was called a Nazi multiple times during protests in 2011 while he was trying to protect schoolgirls from religious mobs who considered their dress immodest. This is a completely wrong use of the word and is very offensive.

Additionally, the idea of banning Holocaust slurs is not too far fetched. "At least half a dozen European nations, along with Brazil, already prohibit the use of Nazi symbols and flags. Even more countries consider it a crime (as Israel has since 1986) to deny that the Holocaust took place."

Some people might say that 'Nazi' shouldn't be banned because it would take away the right of free speech. However, this first amendment right has exceptions. Among these exceptions are threats, false statements, and speech that incites violence. The word 'Nazi' fits in to all of these categories.

In conclusion, the word 'Nazi' should be banned because it is associated with too many horrible memories to be discussed trivially. It is an offensive word when used incorrectly or in the wrong context, and overall is a word with so much hatred attached to it, that it would be more beneficial to ban it.

READING RESPONSE: MOCKINGJAY BY SUZANNE COLLINS

I have nearly finished the final book in The Hunger Games series, Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins. This amazing book is about a place called Panem, or what used to be North America. Panem was split into 13 districts, with the Capitol ruling over all of them. One day, the districts rebelled against the dictatorial Capitol. Unfortunately, the Capitol won the war, and district 13 was destroyed. To keep a revolt from ever happening again, The Capitol set up The Hunger Games, a disturbing game in which 24 children had to fight to the death with all of Panem required to watch. The main character, Katniss, a young survivalist, has won two of these games with her companion Peeta. In this book, Katniss becomes the face of the latest rebellion against The Hunger Games and the Capitol. She and all the other rebels are determined to fight for their freedom.

I am very close to finishing this story, and I don't want to spoil it for people who haven't read it, so all I'm going to say is that I predict that Katniss will vanquish the Capitol and end the Hunger Games once and for all. Throughout the story, Katniss has grown and matured in so many ways. She stepped up to the challenge of becoming "the Mockingjay", or the face of the rebellion. She went through so much pain; being in the Hunger Games,facing The Captiol, witnessing so many deaths, and still she remains a tough determined girl.

The entire Hunger Games series is perhaps the best I've ever read. The author, Suzanne Collins has a beautiful way with words. When she writes, it hooks you into the story, and you can't seem to put it down. She lets the reader go deep into Katniss's head, and experience exactly what she is going through, as if you are actually in the moment. 

In conclusion, Suzanne Collins is an excellent writer, the book is a riveting page turner, and although it may seem  violent, I highly recommend it.

Elizabethan Sonnet

The Mask
By Isobel Weiner 813 

A small smile is plastered onto her face

As if somehow it will hide the deep pain

Tears from before are gone without a trace

And she pushes down thoughts of the insane.

For during the day she is quite carefree,

But when the night comes she takes off the mask,

Which conceals something monstrous and scary,

Her dark feelings in which she must now bask.

And the tears threaten to spill down her cheeks

Her heart aches for the suffering to end,

But she lives with the pain for endless weeks

Stuck in her despair in which she must fend.

And she attempts to break free from the curse,

But that just makes the darkness become worse.

Poetry Analysis Essay on Martin Espada

By Isobel Weiner 813

            Martin Espada is a Brooklyn born Latino poet. He grew up with his father, who was a leader in a Puerto Rican community and an activist who fought for equal opportunities for Hispanics. Because Martin was introduced to politics at such a young age, most of his poetry is political, specifically focusing on the culture and history of Latinos. The poems “Two Mexicanos Lynched in Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877”, “Revolutionary Spanish Lesson”, and “The New Bathroom Policy at English High School” by Martin Espada make the reader think about how the abuse of power can affect people and cultures, specifically Latinos.

            The first poem, “Two Mexicanos Lynched in Santa Cruz, California, May 3, 1877” has great emotional intensity because the abuse of power is so violent. The white people, or ‘gringos’ abuse the power of their ‘superiority’ given to them by society because of their race, by turning a lynching of two Mexicanos into a spectacle and then celebrating the event with a photograph. The quote, “More than the moment/when forty gringo vigilantes/cheered the rope/that snapped two Mexicanos/into the grimacing sleep of broken necks”, shows how the gringos turned the horrific event into a public viewing and treated the Mexicanos like hunted animals. The power felt by white people is so inbred that this gruesome event becomes a celebration to record with a photograph, “a high-collar boy smirking, some peering/from the shade of bowler hats, but all/crowding into the photograph.”

            In the poem “Revolutionary Spanish Lesson”, the white Americans abuse their ‘superior’ power that is given to them because of their race by mispronouncing the narrator’s name and assuming that he is a foreign Latino immigrant and is therefore unequal to them. This is indicated by Espada referring to “a busload/of Republican tourists/from Wisconsin”, which represents the most traditional white conservative group. Power in the hands of ignorant people causes the narrator to imagine himself as the revolutionary stereotype “Che Guevara”, which is evident when he states “I want to buy a toy pistol,/put on dark sunglasses,/push my beret to an angle,/comb my beard to a point.” The narrator has obviously experienced this lack of cultural awareness multiple times, and the anger he feels towards the more ‘powerful’ white Americans is striking.

            The narrator in the final poem, “The New Bathroom Policy at English High School”, demonstrates how the abuse of power by one individual can affect a whole group of people. In this case, the individual is the principal, who abuses his authority by deciding, “to ban Spanish/in the bathrooms” because he makes the assumption that students are talking negatively about him in Spanish. This is shown in the in the poem when Espada writes “The boys chatter Spanish/in the bathroom/while the principal/listens from his stall/The only word he recognizes/is his own name/and this constipates him.” He exerts his control over the students by enforcing this ban and no doubt causing the boys feel uncomfortable and excluded.

            In conclusion, each poem allows the reader to understand how the abuse of power can negatively affect people and cultures, and in Espada’s case, Latinos. The narrator evokes great empathy for the predicament of the Latinos when faced with the indignity of being considered inferior. Espada highlights how abuse of power can come from ignorance, racism, and disrespect, and how it can have such a deep affect on different cultures.

READING RESPONSE: WAR HORSE BY MICHAEL MORPURGO

Currently, I am reading War Horse by Michael Morpurgo. This book is about a young boy named Albert going through World War One with his horse as his only friend. One day Albert's father sells his horse, Joey, to serve in the army cavalry. Albert is devastated and once he comes of age, he joins the army to find Joey. Through battles and bombings he searches for Joey, until eventually he finds him.

I predict that Albert and Joey will have major difficulties while looking for each other, since World War One is raging all around them. Albert will probably have to decide which he prefers more: his life, or his horse. Albert is a courageous young boy, and his very determined;he must be if he is willing to enter a war zone for his horse.

Michael Morpurgo is an astonishingly good author. He has such a great fluency and voice in his writing. The book is a magical story from the beginning to the end.

In conclusion, I think the book is a wonderful piece of writing and is definitely one of the best I've read.